back arrow link to Gifted Ed. index
DoDEA Gifted Ed. logo
IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES COMMITTEE REVIEW
STEPS IN THE IDENTIFICATION CONTINUING ELIGIBILITY
GUIDELINES FOR  ELIGIBILITY APPEALS

IDENTIFICATION PROCEDURES  (Top)
Purpose
The purpose of identification in the gifted program is to find students whose potential and/or performance is so extraordinary that they require differentiation in their instructional program

Goals
 1. Locate and recognize students in grades K-12 with extremely strong learning profiles in the areas of:

  • Intellectual ability 
  • Academic achievement (general or specific)
2.  Use multiple criteria for eligibility and specific procedures that acknowledge the variety of ways and environments in which students manifest giftedness.

The School Gifted Review Committee
A Gifted Review Committee is formed at each school to facilitate the identification process.  Membership consists of at least three representatives selected by the principal.  Members should include those with expertise in general gifted characteristics and behaviors, and knowledge of the intellectual, academic and/or artistic areas being considered. Members generally serve for one school year and may be reappointed the following year.  The chairperson of the committee may be the gifted resource teacher or another school educator selected by the principal. Input from individuals who know the student well, including the student himself/herself, peers, parents, teachers, and others in the school community should be encouraged. 

The Gifted Review Committee receives and considers referrals on a regular basis throughout the school year.  Transferring students should be considered as soon as possible after the transfer.  Other referrals should be considered on a quarterly basis, at a minimum.

STEPS IN THE IDENTIFICATION PROCESS  (Top)
1. Referral of students for consideration by the Gifted Review Committee will be completed through: 

  •  Screening - Available data on all students are used to find likely candidates for gifted program services. Screening never excludes a student from consideration in the identification process.  Students not referred through screening may be referred through nomination.
  • Nomination  - Individual students are recommended by professional staff members, parents/guardians, or through self-nomination. No qualifying test scores are required for nomination.
  • Transfer Records  - Students whose records from schools outside of DoDEA indicate eligibility for a gifted program are recommended for immediate review. 
2. Assessment of each referred student is completed with parent or guardian permission.

3. An eligibility decision for each candidate is made through a review of the student's assessment profile. 

4. Determination of gifted program services for eligible students is the decision of the Gifted Review Committee. 

Referral 
The purpose of referral is to provide the Gifted Review Committee with names of students who should be assessed and considered for eligibility for gifted program services.  Students are referred through the screening process, by individual recommendation of a teacher, parent, or professional staff member or self-nomination, or as the result of previous eligibility in a non-DoDEA school.  If no ability or achievement scores are available for a student, the student may be referred without such data.  Parent or guardian permission for further review must be received prior to assessment and committee review of a student. 

Referral through Screening
The purpose of screening is to quickly locate likely candidates for consideration by the Gifted Review Committee.  Screening of all students occurs through: 
Group ability testing for second grade students (scores in the top 5% of the population)

  • A student whose total score on the TerraNova achievement test is at or above 97th percentile should be considered for referral.
  • Review of students' performance on TerraNova achievement tests, grades 3-11 (total battery  scores at or above 97th percentile)  Students whose test scores meet the criteria are referred to the Gifted Review Committee. 
  • A student whose total score on the TerraNova achievement test is lower than the 97th percentile may be considered through nomination.  Results from other nationally normed achievement tests may be considered.
Referral through Nomination 
The purpose of nomination is to encourage consideration of students who appear to be potential candidates but do not have achievement test scores available or at a level high enough for an automatic referral. Other candidates may have compelling evidence from ability tests, classroom additional performance, or data.  Professional staff members, parents/guardians, or students themselves nominate candidates.  Rating scales and an accompanying narrative describing each student's strengths are completed for nominated students.

Referral through Transfer Records
Students who have been found eligible at a DoDEA school shall be automatically eligible for services when transferring to another DoDDS or DDESS school.  The Gifted Review Committee should review the profiles of these DoDEA transferring students as soon as possible to recommend program services. 

Students transferring into a DoDEA school from a public or private school who provide evidence of participation in a gifted program should be referred to the Gifted Review Committee as soon as possible to be considered for determine eligibility.

Assessment 
The purpose of assessment for the gifted program is to provide the Gifted Review Committee with sufficient information to make a decision on eligibility.  Assessment of referred students should incorporate the use of multiple measures.  A profile of each student's strengths is developed through the use of these measures. (Folders containing information on each student's strengths are prepared for committee use).  Strategies and instruments available for use by schools are defined in Table 1.  Additional data available at the school may be included in the student's profile folder for committee review.  Such information may come from teachers, parents, students, or others knowledgeable of the student's strengths.  Folders profiling each student's strengths are prepared for committee use. 

Assessment Options 

  • Intellectual Ability- Academic Achievement
  • Individual IQ test 
  • Individual achievement test Interview
  • Group ability test 
  • Group achievement test Performance/display
  • Record of observations Grades Record of observations
  • Record of accomplishments 
  • Rating scale Rating scale
  • Portfolio
Eligibility
The Gifted Review Committee makes a decision on eligibility for each student. Profiles of students' strengths include data from multiple sources as indicated above.  The A folder prepared for each student should include all assessment data as well as any  other significant information.  Committee members to review each child's strengths.  If limited data are available, the committee chairperson should collect additional information prior to this review.

No single score or matrix total should define a student's eligibility for gifted program services.  Rather, the committee should look at all available data to reach a professional decision on each student.. 

GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY (Top)
Table 2 provides guidance for interpreting student assessment data.  Scores or levels defined in each area represent the expectation that a student is demonstrating strength at the highest levels, equivalent to the top 2-4%-3-5% of students of similar age in this area of ability or achievement.  The Gifted Review Committee should note scores or indicators of student potential and/or performance at this high level in making an eligibility decision.

  The committee should recognize that a student's profile of strengths may not be evidenced in a traditional manner.  Linguistic and cultural differences may mask individual student strengths.  It is important that the committee members look at all available data in determining a student's eligibility. 

  Students found eligible should be demonstrating more than one indicator of exceptional performance or the capability of attaining high performance with the support of gifted program services. 

Guidelines for Gifted Committee Decision Making
 The following guidelines have been developed to assist Gifted Review Committee members in making eligibility decisions.Indicators of Highly Unusual Ability/Performance/Achievement
Eligible students demonstrate more than one of the following indicators: 
Intellectual Ability

  •   An IQ score of 130 or higher on an individual psychological IQ test
  • A total score at or above 95th  percentile on the -Raven Progressive Matrices- a group  ability test.
  • A score at or above 97th percentile on the Test of Cognitive Skills-
  • An average rating scale score of 36 or higher from two or more ratings -educator raters. 
  • Qualitative data (observations, anecdotal evidence) indicative of highly unusual ability or achievement narratives, interviews
and/or-
 Academic Achievement
  • A total battery - score at or above 97th percentile on TerraNova -a nationally normed achievement
  • A total score at or above 97th percentile on an alternative standardized achievement test 
  • Qualitative data (observations, anecdotal evidence, portfolios) giving clear evidence of highly unusual academic performance 
COMMITTEE REVIEW  (Top)
An individual student's profile of strengths provides the Gifted Review Committee with data for decision making about eligibility.  Information from the assessment profile as well as any other data of relevance provided to the committee should be used. No single score and no summed scores from a matrix shall be used for identification.  Rather, the committee reviews the profile of student strengths and makes a professional decision about eligibility. 

The Gifted Review Committee determines that the child is eligible for services, ineligible for services, or is to be monitored.  Each member of the Gifted Review Committee independently reviews a student's profile.  Using the available data and the indicators of highly unusual ability and/or performance, each member determines a student eligible, ineligible, or to be monitored.  If all members agree, a student is eligible.  If not all members indicate eligibility, the committee as a whole reviews the profile and makes a decision. 

Services for students found eligible are recommended by the Gifted Review Committee and coordinated through the school principal, the gifted resource teacher, classroom teachers, and other school professionals as appropriate.  All schools will offer services for students found eligible as intellectually/academically gifted, or gifted in the performing arts.  Gifted program options are defined in Section II, Guidelines and Requirements for Gifted Program Services, K-12. 

Students found ineligible for gifted program services may benefit from general enrichment activities within the school.  Their profiles of strength should be shared with classroom teachers, parents, the students themselves, and other professionals in the school.  The gifted resource teacher may be able to assist the school community in recognizing and maximizing the special strengths of students found ineligible. 

Students selected for monitoring are those whose profiles indicate strong potential but do not appear ready to participate in a gifted program.  Students who are gifted and  underachieving are typical candidates in this category.  The gifted resource teacher and other school professionals should carefully follow each monitored student during the semester.  Additional data on these students should be collected and reviewed by the Gifted Review Committee the next semester. Like those students found ineligible, students to be monitored should be given opportunities to use and enhance their talents and gifts. Students may remain in a monitored status for up to two semesters.

CONTINUING ELIGIBILITY  (Top)
Eligibility for the gifted program-The progress of student's receiving gifted education services is reviewed annually by the Gifted Review Committee.  The review is generally completed at the end of the school year to document eligibility for the upcoming school year. Information about student performance and outcomes in the program is considered in the decision to continue eligibility for the next school year.  Students who do not experience success through gifted program services may be recommended for monitoring.  This change in status is reviewed by semester.  A student should be recommended for ineligibility after a period of monitoring equivalent to two semesters. 

APPEALS (Top)
A parent or guardian of a student found ineligible for gifted program services may appeal the decision of the committee.  A parent or guardian who wishes to file an appeal concerning the process for identifying a student or services provided under the auspices of the gifted program may present an appeal to the school principal. 

4/8/03

School mascot link to Home Page